Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Trifles, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Trifles paper at affordable prices with livepaperhelp.com!
As you read Susan Glaspell’s play, Trifles, the plot is very clear. The characters are trying to find evidence and motives to murder mystery. There is also a sort of underlying message or conflict with the characters that focuses on being loyal to your own sex. Both of these messages are so clear that one could argue to which one is the actual theme of the play. This is because the play ends with the women finding the evidence that could lead to the murderer and their motive. Instead they do not reveal to the men what they found. The murder is never actually solved, although it is quite clear to the readers and the audience who the murderer is. The men in the play are clear in their own minds without any substantial evidence to who committed the murder also. The play ends without really stating an outcome of the whole situation. The audience is left to guess as to what happens in the end base on what “evidence” they are given.
The argument that the theme or message of the play is being loyal to one’s sex begins with the name of the play, Trifles. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines trifles as something of little value, substance or importance. There was a comment made in the play that women always worry about trifles. This is where the sub-conflict becomes clear and also the reason for naming the play Trifles. Why would the playwright name the play Trifles, if that was not supposed to be the message she wanted to conveyed? The men in the play never found real evidence or a motive to the murder that took place. They also never found out about the evidence that the women found that could have possibly led to the motive of the murder.
The setting of the play is in an abandoned farmhouse, where a murder took place the night before. The five characters are entering the house, where it is dark, cold and uninviting. Before this night and the night in question, a couple named Mr. and Mrs. Wright occupied the house. The men are confident when entering the house, whereas the women stand nearer the door. As Mr. Hale, a neighboring farmer, who found the murdered victim, is describing to the county attorney, Mr. Henderson, what he saw when he entered the house the day before, he states why he had come to visit the family. His reason for stopping by the Wright’s place was to see if they were at all interested in going in on a party line. He thought that if he asked Mr. Wright in the presence of his wife it might persuade him to go in on the line. As he is saying this it dawns on him that what Mr. Wright’s wife wanted made no difference to Mr. Wight anyway. The county attorney puts off the comment wanting to get more information on what Mr. Hale saw yesterday, instead of maybe gaining insight on the couple and how they interacted with each, which could have led to clues to the motive of the murder.
The men look around the house looking for visible clues and ridiculing how Mrs. Wright kept up her house. The woman then start to sympathize with Mrs. Wright, because they would not want men coming into their own homes speaking of what a poor job they did housekeeping. Housekeeping is a hard job and is one that the women of the play take very seriously. The women have bonded with Mrs. Wright even though she is not present. They are all housewives and understand what they go through each day doing their jobs.
Buy Trifles term paper
While the men are in another room looking around and discussing the case the women are also doing the same thing. The women are not asked to help look for clues or for their opinion on what they think a motive could be. Mrs. Wright being a housewife, had much more in common with the women in the play and they probably could have given the men some help to the stress of their daily life, which might have helped them in the end.
Although each person in the play may have had their own character, attitude and beliefs that differ from one another, I think that they were separated in this play by men in women. The men in the play were the professionals, they were knowledgeable and they sort of looked down on the women. The women in the play were more submissive; they obeyed the men. They too were also very knowledgeable; they just were not recognized for it.
The climax of the play is when the women found the evidence and the men walked in. Up to this point it was clear that someone had been murdered and there was only one person in the house when the victim was found. The story that Mrs. Wright gave when she was questioned about the murder was unrealistic. The only thing that they really needed to convict her of murder was some sort of evidence as to why she would have murdered her husband. The women find this evidence and they had it when the men walk in. The audience thinks that if they show the men the evidence the case will be solved and the story is over. The women in the play are probably thinking about their position in life. As to where they stand in terms of the men. The evidence they found was a bird with a rope tied around his neck just like Mr. Wright was murdered. They came up with a motive as to why the bird had been killed and why Mr. Wright had been killed. This motive made perfectly good sense to them and to the audience. If it had been presented to the men do you think they would have saw it the same why? I don’t think so. The women, I think basically saw no purpose in showing the men the evidence because they would not understand the motive that they had come up with. They would probably think that it was crazy and so was Mrs. Wright. So they did not even bother with trying to argue their point.
If the play would have ended a little differently then maybe the theme could be trying to uncover evidence to a murder, hands down. The women in the play kept the clues that they found from the men partly because they might have felt a certain bond with this woman. They also kept the evidence away from the men because their ability to help was questionable by the men. The men in they play are arrogant, which is why they did not solve the case. They were not focused so much on the motive and the events that led up to the murder, but actual scene of the crime.
It may seem silly to argue this point because with out a doubt Mrs. Wright did in fact murder her husband and if this was a real life story she probably would have been tried and convicted, even without the clues that the women found. The men found what they were looking for which was nothing. I say nothing because they went into house almost sure that Mrs. Wright had killed her husband, therefore they needed nothing else to prove that. They wanted to find physical evidence to the murder. There was no forced entry and no evidence of a struggle that they could find. The women were not looking for evidence but still found some. They were just looking to see what kind of person Mrs. Wright was and they found her motive for killing her husband. Although Mrs. Wright was probably tried and convicted of the murder without the evidence the women found, their clues were still valuable. One should not call them trifles.
The message that I got from the play, Trifles, was that men and women approach things in their own way. This does not make one better than the other. Both are very capable of getting the job done and doing it well. It might be a little easier if both sexes would put their differences aside and listen to one another. If the play lasted longer and the case was taken to trial, it probably would have ended much sooner with the evidence that the women found. Or maybe Mrs. Wright could have gotten a lighter sentencing because of the obvious pain she was going through while living in that house with her husband. A husband who didn’t care to hear her opinions or about how she was feeling. Maybe the women in the play were trying to cover up things for Mrs. Wright because they understood what could make her do such a thing. Not being appreciated for the hard work that they do, maybe the thought of killing those who put them down crossed all of their minds. It was just Mrs. Wright who was fed up and acted upon her thoughts.
Please note that this sample paper on Trifles is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Trifles, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Trifles will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment from livepaperhelp.com and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.